Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>At 05:09 PM 3/23/2001 -0800, Damien Neil wrote:
>>So the results of ord are dependent on a global setting for "current
>>character set" or some such, not on the encoding of the string that
>>is passed to it?
>
>Nope, ord is dependent on the string it gets, as those strings know what
>their encoding is.
And the code knows what it wants: if I am in an EBCDIC context
then I am going to expect ord to be ones I am used to.
This the main pain with 5.7.*'s EBCDIC scheme - making
ord('A') == 193
true :-/
> chr is the one dependent on the current default encoding.
You are going to see both used in legacy stuff.
--
Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Unicode handling Dave Storrs
- Re: Unicode handling Philip Newton
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Brad Hughes
- RE: Unicode handling Garrett Goebel
- RE: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Larry Wall
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- RE: Unicode handling Garrett Goebel
- RE: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- RE: Unicode handling Garrett Goebel
