At 01:13 PM 6/13/2001 +0200, Bart Lateur wrote: >On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 18:12:35 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > >'Kay, here's a question to ponder. Should the op dispatch loop handle > >argument decoding, or should that be left to the opcode functions? > >Are you talking about lazy vs. normal evaluation? Nope. That's a separate issue. This is more "Does an opcode get passed a register number or a pointer" one. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Should the op dispatch loop decode? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Damien Neil
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Bart Lateur
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Uri Guttman
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Simon Cozens
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Simon Cozens
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Dan Sugalski