At 01:13 PM 6/13/2001 +0200, Bart Lateur wrote:
>On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 18:12:35 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> >'Kay, here's a question to ponder. Should the op dispatch loop handle
> >argument decoding, or should that be left to the opcode functions?
>
>Are you talking about lazy vs. normal evaluation?
Nope. That's a separate issue. This is more "Does an opcode get passed a
register number or a pointer" one.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Should the op dispatch loop decode? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Damien Neil
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Bart Lateur
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Uri Guttman
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Simon Cozens
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Simon Cozens
- Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? Dan Sugalski
