At 08:00 PM 9/10/2001 -0400, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
>On Monday 10 September 2001 06:23 pm, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > At 05:23 PM 9/10/2001 -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> > >First off, here's an inconsistancy I found: In test.pasm
> > >
> > >REDO: eq_i_ic I2, I4, DONE, NEXT
> > >
> > >appears. Shouldn't this be comparing to a constant, not a register?
> >
> > Nope, though if I let you in on the actual secret it's help.
> >
> > That should really be eq_i_ic_ic. (Well, actually there should be only one
> > label, and we fall through otherwise. It's a bug in implementation and
> > assembly, not opcode name... :) The intention is the last _x covers the
> > last arg, the next to last covers the next to last arg, and so on. When we
> > run out, we repeat the innermost type.
>
>Why are you doing right-to-left instead of left-to-right?
Because I think backwards from most people, apparently. :)
That and generally speaking if there are three args the second is the same
type as the first, while the third is the variant. Generally.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
