At 07:15 AM 10/22/2001 -0700, Wizard wrote:
> > 1) Do we put them all in the parrot CVS tree
>
>I think it would be good for the languages to be in tree, but I would like
>to have it under a different mechanism for cvs checkout. In other words, the
>default cvs checkout of parrot does NOT check out the languages tree, but a
>separate checkout is required for the languages.
I'll ask Ask and see what we can do for that.
> > 2) Do we require them to meet the same levels of quality as the core
> > interpreter?
>At some point they should need to meet same criteria as the parrot. Right
>now, I think the priority is parrot and should remain such. I think the
>language implementations are just an experiment, and should not be held to
>the same criteria (that should be stated somewhere). However, at some
>predetermined point, some resources should be redirected to testing and
>refining all of the subtrees (including docs).
Yeah, I think you're right here. It'll be one thing when we have
fully-working ports of other languages to Parrot but for now most of these
should be considered interesting tangents.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
