At 06:09 PM 10/27/2001 -0400, John Siracusa wrote:
>On 10/27/01 4:22 PM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > At 06:27 AM 10/27/2001 -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) writes:
> >> I think Robert and I are planning to get mod_parrot to work as soon as
> >> parrot has some kind of I/O. :-)
> >
> > Darned soon now.
> >
> > So I know for the first-stage rollout, does Apache's module system support
> > Apache managing filehandles and modules calling apache's I/O routines, or
> > does it just do weird magic with I/O on normal filehandles?
>
>Which apache module system would this be, 1.3 or 2.0?
Got me. I'd say ask Ask. :)
>What do the relative
>"schedules" (heh? :) of Parrot/Perl 6 and apache 2.0 look like? It'd be
>nice not to end up with one or the other being out of step (e.g.
>mod_perl6/parrot for apache 1.3 arriving long after apache 2.0 is the
>established standard)
I think we're due out in reasonably good alpha/beta shape for the summer.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
