On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Leon Brocard wrote: > mops.pasm uses a very simple loop to figure out how many operations a > second parrot can go. However, the loop it uses is inefficient: it > does a "branch" *and* an "eq" every time around.
> mops.pasm: 11.713909 > ./mops: 108.442655 > > mops.pasm: 10.647256 > ./mops: 73.574232 > > Of course, the benchmark could be improved, but I suggest we should at > least change it to be good, tight code ;-) Perhaps it's just too late at night, but if this cange makes it better, tighter code, shouldn't it make the MOPS numbers look better, not worse? -=- James Mastros -- Put bin Laden out like a bad cigar: http://www.fieler.com/terror "You know what happens when you bomb Afghanastan? Thats right, you knock over the rubble." -=- SLM