On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: > Currently, instead of pushing the contents of fixed registers onto the > stack, the registers themselves float on top of the stack. That doesn't > preserve register contents on a push_x, as the registers are now in a new > memory location. After toying with fixed registers per interpreter, I > decided that it probably wasn't worth it in the long haul. (Since it's > doubtful, given the size of our register sets, that this would need to be > done often.) Instead, I'm proposing a parallel set of data-preserving > push_x ops, save_x. Patch after .sig.
The following have skipped tests in stacks.t: push_n_c push_i_c push_s_c as they were documented in doc/parrot_assembly.pod but the functionality wasn't written when I wrote the tests so you may want to call them after these. Then there's no tests to skip. yay. Alex Gough -- #!/usr/bin/perl use Quantum::Entanglement qw(:DEFAULT :complex); $language = entangle(1,'python',1/i,'C',i*i,'Perl',1/i**2,'Java',i**5,'C#'); print "Just another $language hacker,\n" if $language eq 'Perl';
