At 12:36 PM 12/5/2001 -0600, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > The Zork interpreter might be stack based, thinking about it, but it was
> > hardly geared for speed, so I don't know that it'd count if it was.
>
>FWIW, there are many MUDs and MUCKs out there (multiplayer text-based
>role-playing gmaes for those not in the know) that use a variation on
>FORTH as their programming language, which is purely stack-based IIRC.
Right, but FORTH's not an interpreted language, generally speaking.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
