Stephen Rawls wrote: > since I want the Tuple pmc to do the same thing in > this respect as the PerlArray pmc.
just my opinion, but I don't want this. it would be PerlTuple then. let's keep this stuff at a higher level. the only and one reason I see because one would implement tuples instead of arrays is: speed. no need to cope with dynamic memory allocation, no need to grow or shrink, se there should also be no need to check for syntactic sugar like negative indices. cheers, Aldo __END__ $_=q,just perl,,s, , another ,,s,$, hacker,,print;
