--- Aldo Calpini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > there should also be no need to check for > syntactic sugar like negative indices.
True, I suppose if a language REALLY wanted this, it could be implemented on the interpreter level. <changing subject> Also of note, instead of having TUPLE1 + TUPLE2 act as arrays, and return the sum of their sizes, I am treating it like this: (a1, a2, ... , an) + (b1, b2, .... , bn) = (a1 + b1, a2 + b2, ... , an + bn) This is (of course) not restricted to addition. I thought I'd check and see if you all feel that should be the default implementation, though. Or maybe we need a special HyperTuple pmc too? cheers, Stephen Rawls __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com
