Steve Fink (via RT) wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Steve Fink > # Please include the string: [perl #17039] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # <URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17039 >
Why intarrary.pmc: > +=item B<push>(in PMC, in PMC) ... > +=item B<push>(in PMC, in INT) There are already very useful arrary operations, which are currently used in e.g. embed.c namely "push_string" and these don't have an opcode. perl6/P6C array flattening code would be cut down by ~2/3, when this opcode is implemented (push ..) I see a forthcoming pollution of core.ops namespace. And I can't imagine (now at 0.40pm ;), we need a third array class - but I didn't read the patch. One array base class doing it, ought to be enough. So why doesn't this fit in array.pmc, which PerlArray does reuse? Minor note: todays in/inout conclusion is currently :-) "inout". my 2 ¢ leo
