[CVS ci] (was: NULL (was Re: cvs commit: parrot interpreter.c stacks.c))

[Leopold Toetsch]

Leopold Toetsch wrote:

Nicholas Clark wrote:

It's not likely to be a portability problem,

To NULL or not to NULL, this is the question.

I introduced a macro, depending on a symbol HAS_NON_ZERO_NULL, which should be set for these architecures.

Currently interpreter.c only, other files will follow, if people are ok with this.

leo