On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:15:06PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > >Nicholas Clark wrote: > > > >>It's not likely to be a portability problem, > > > >To NULL or not to NULL, this is the question. > > I introduced a macro, depending on a symbol HAS_NON_ZERO_NULL, which > should be set for these architecures. > > Currently interpreter.c only, other files will follow, if people are ok > with this.
I think that this is a good idea, and was going to suggest it myself. [bah. you beat me too it :-)] Nicholas Clark -- INTERCAL better than perl? http://www.perl.org/advocacy/spoofathon/
