Leon Brocard wrote: > It's been a while since 0.0.9 (errr, 20th Dec). A lot has changed > since then. Maybe it's time for a 0.1.0 release. What are we waiting > for?
Dan said: "either exceptions or objects". Once we have one, we'll go to 0.1.0, and when the second will be implemented (order does not matter), we'll go to 0.2.0. Or am I wrong? Btw, a proper i/o layer would be nice to have, too... > And why do we have so many version numbers? It'd be nice to have > objects, otherwise we're restricted to toy languages. And even toy languages may benefit from objects (yes, I really need objects in order to implement -98 version of Befunge, especially since I want to include concurrent-funge support). Well, I could use my own hand-crafted objects as a list of whatever, but fun would be much greater with objects. Jerome -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
