On Sep-24, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > No. But you are right. That's the code (/s\$I2/\$I1/) that ".args" > should produce. Perhaps we shoud name the directive ".flatten_arg".
Yes, that makes its purpose more clear than calling it ".args". > > Is it supposed to do deep flattening? Do we need ".deeply_flatten_arg" > too? It should not deeply flatten, and I didn't see anywhere in A6 that indicated that we ever deeply flatten. There is a ** prefix operator, but it is only "more splattier" than * in that it is required to immediately evaluate its operand (eg, **1..Inf is supposed to do something bad). But I don't even want to think about lazy lists yet, anyway.
