On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Melvin Smith wrote: > We DO need a Parrot Programming FAQ. I propose the IMCC faq functions > as just that. We can still have the current Parrot FAQ, which is > great at answering generic questions for people who haven't swallowed > the blue pill yet. (Or was it the red pill, I vaguely remember Dan in a black > trenchcoat and glasses, and guns.....)
I think separating the IMCC and parrot programming FAQs, or making the IMCC faq a section of a larger Parrot FAQ, would be better. The IMCC FAQ really ought to be about syntax rather than semantics. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk