> We're already using 'eq' to perform equality testing, and in the interests > of maintaining a consistent design I would choose to stick with something > eq-related as opposed to changing it to 'same'. > > eqaddr/eqval? eq_addr/eq_val? eq_address/eq_value?
So just to follow up on this thread, was there any preference at all for the name of the opcode performing equality testing of PMC memory addresses? I needed the functionality for the code I'm working on, so I've created a patch implementing an "eq_addr" opcode... Regards, Cory
