I don't think there was ever a consensus about opcode naming.
It seems that we need this but can you give an example
of where you are using it, just to give me some context to think
with?
-Melvin
Cory Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12/03/2003 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Determining PMC memory addresses
> We're already using 'eq' to perform equality testing, and in the
interests
> of maintaining a consistent design I would choose to stick with
something
> eq-related as opposed to changing it to 'same'.
>
> eqaddr/eqval? eq_addr/eq_val? eq_address/eq_value?
So just to follow up on this thread, was there any preference at all for
the name of the opcode performing equality testing of PMC memory
addresses? I needed the functionality for the code I'm working on, so
I've created a patch implementing an "eq_addr" opcode...
Regards,
Cory
