Is there a reason why the names have to be so terse?

Mutable is not a bad word for able-to-change. (Cribbed from Cocoa, though there the immutability is absolute).

*) Array - fixed-size, mixed-type array
*) MutablePArray - variable-sized PMC array
*) PArray - Fixed-size PMC array
*) MutableSArray - variable-sized string array
*) SArray - fixed-size string array

Mike

On 22 Jan 2004, at 19:24, Dan Sugalski wrote:

At 2:15 PM -0500 1/21/04, Matt Fowles wrote:
All~

So, lets do the classes as:

*) Array - fixed-size, mixed-type array
*) vPArray - variable-sized PMC array
*) PArray - Fixed-size PMC array
*) vSArray - variable-sized string array
*) SArray - fixed-size string array

I suggest using "Array" to mean fixed size and "Vector" to mean variable size.

I'd rather not. Vector, for me at least, has some specific connotations (from physics) that don't really match what we're talking about here. They're more vectors in the mathematical sense, but they won't behave like mathematical vectors so I don't think that's a good idea either.


Array, while mundane (and a bit annoying with the prefix stuff tacked on) is at least accurate.
--
Dan


--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk





Reply via email to