On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 10:20, Jerome Quelin wrote: > I really dislike having to .include sdl.imc in a sub to .include the > other outside...
Me too. There's supposed to be a magic initialization sub of some kind called on library load. I'm inclined to stick it in there, but it's not there yet. One downside of making sdl.imc smarter (changing it from sdl.pasm) is that we can no longer use build_tools/build_nativecall.pl as is. That may be an argument for making the tool smarter. Dan, Leo? -- c
