Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Me too. There's supposed to be a magic initialization sub of some kind > called on library load. I'm inclined to stick it in there, but it's not > there yet.
I'll have a look at that _init call tomorrow - albeit _init (it was that name IIRC) could be a too commonly used label. _library_init or such could be better. > One downside of making sdl.imc smarter (changing it from sdl.pasm) is > that we can no longer use build_tools/build_nativecall.pl as is. That > may be an argument for making the tool smarter. Why? > -- c leo
