On Monday 20 October 2008 10:25:06 Mark Glines wrote: > chromatic wrote: > > 2) What's setting an invalid pointer-to-a-PMC here? > > This question is answered at the end of the following dump. (This is > one of the things I nopasted during our IRC discussion last week, thanks > for your guidance in producing it.) > > One interesting question: the pointer-to-a-PMC is written a couple times > by the CPointer class, and then written by BigInt once. Was that expected?
Fixed in r32065. -- c
