On Sun, 16 Nov 2008, chromatic via RT wrote:
> Storable 2.18 required in r32744, which should resolve this issue.
But the ultimate problem was that the issue was an unnecessary hurdle.
At the time of the bug report, I tried building with Storable-2.12 and
with 2.18 and observed *no difference*. That means that Storable-2.13
wasn't really *required* at all.
I agree that explicitly requiring 2.18 early on gives a failure with a
clear error message right away, which is definitely much better than
getting a failure a long time after you've started the process and walked
away. It's just that no failure is necessary at all. 2.12 worked just
fine for parrot.
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
