At 12:28 PM 8/29/00 -0400, Karl Glazebrook wrote:
>But scalars are not compact.
Since scalars are singular things, how would you compact them anyway?
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: New variable type: matrix Damian Conway
- Re: New variable type: matrix Nathan Wiger
- Re: New variable type: matrix Buddha Buck
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jeremy Howard
- Re: New variable type: matrix Christian Soeller
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jeremy Howard
- Re: New variable type: matrix Baris
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jim Edwards
- Re: New variable type: matrix Nathan Wiger
- Re: New variable type: matrix Karl Glazebrook
- Re: New variable type: matrix Dan Sugalski
- Re: New variable type: matrix Karl Glazebrook
- Re: New variable type: matrix Dan Sugalski
- Re: New variable type: matrix Baris
- Re: New variable type: matrix Christian Soeller
- Re: New variable type: matrix Dan Sugalski
- Re: New variable type: matrix Karl Glazebrook
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jeremy Howard
- Re: New variable type: matrix Christian Soeller
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jeremy Howard
- Re: New variable type: matrix Dan Sugalski
