Jeremy Howard wrote: > > > Ditto. As I said yesterday, my current preferred option is that a list ref > of list refs will also support a multidimensional indexing syntax. > Furthermore, if it has a single basic data type and is declared ':compact' > it should be stored in a contiguous block of memory. Sounds good. Nothing in the syntax should make assumptions how the multi-dim array is implemented (e.g. list of list-refs or whatever). Christian
- Re: New variable type: matrix Nathan Wiger
- Re: New variable type: matrix Karl Glazebrook
- Re: New variable type: matrix Dan Sugalski
- Re: New variable type: matrix Karl Glazebrook
- Re: New variable type: matrix Dan Sugalski
- Re: New variable type: matrix Baris
- Re: New variable type: matrix Christian Soeller
- Re: New variable type: matrix Dan Sugalski
- Re: New variable type: matrix Karl Glazebrook
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jeremy Howard
- Re: New variable type: matrix Christian Soeller
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jeremy Howard
- Re: New variable type: matrix Dan Sugalski
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jeremy Howard
- Re: New variable type: matrix Karl Glazebrook
- Re: New variable type: matrix Dan Sugalski
- Re: New variable type: matrix Karl Glazebrook
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jeremy Howard
- Re: New variable type: matrix Buddha Buck
- Re: New variable type: matrix Jeremy Howard
- Re: New variable type: matrix Nathan Wiger