>>>>> "TO" == Tony Olekshy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The unwind logic would treat a scope with no exception set _as if_ >> each call were wrapped in at try block. TO> I don't think so. If no exception is in scope Perl should continue TO> to generate and propagate exceptions (die and $@) as it does now, TO> so we don't break tradition. No, that should be the difference between die and throw. Die is immediately fatal. (i.e. current semantics) throw is new and does the magic. We get no breakage that way. <chaim> -- Chaim Frenkel Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
- Re: On the case for exception-based error han... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Bennett Todd
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Bennett Todd
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error han... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error han... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: On the case for exception-based error... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based error... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Markus Peter