On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 08:11:55PM +0000, David L. Nicol wrote: > Would someone please enlighten me as to the purpose of an explicit "try." In my mind it allows the important code to come before the "oh crap something went wrong" code. Graham.
- Re: RFC 63 (v3) Exception handling syntax Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 63 (v3) Exception handling syntax Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 63 (v3) Exception handling syntax Piers Cawley
- "Try? There is no try." -- Yoda's Exception... David L. Nicol
- Re: "Try? There is no try." -- Yoda's ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: "Try? There is no try." -- Yoda's ... Peter Scott
- Re: "Try? There is no try." -- Yod... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: "Try? There is no try." --... Piers Cawley
- Re: "Try? There is no try." -- Yod... Dave Storrs
- Re: "Try? There is no try." -- Yoda's ... Tony Olekshy
- Re: "Try? There is no try." -- Yoda's ... Graham Barr
- Re: "Try? There is no try." -- Yoda's ... Dave Storrs
- Re: RFC 63 (v3) Exception handling syntax Dave Rolsky
