At 08:19 29/08/00 -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> > As far as I can see the current consensus is as follows:
> > 1. Implicit variable: nice but not really worth the trouble.
> > 2. Explicit variable between foreach and the array: might conflict
> > with other proposals.
> > 3. Explicit counter in the body of the for/each loop: a clean
> > solution but requires a new or reused function.
>
>What happened to explicit variable(s) *after* the list?
>
> for (@array) $index { ... }
Forgot it. :) I'll put it in the summary.
John McNamara
--
"Something tells me we aren't programming in Pascal anymore, Toto."
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit co... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit co... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit co... Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for statemen... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for stat... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for ... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for statements, p... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for statements, p... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for statemen... John McNamara
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for stat... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for ... John McNamara
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for stat... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for stat... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counte... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit co... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counte... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for stat... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for ... Tom Christiansen
