On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 11:21:26 -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote: >One could argue that do{} should take return so it might have a value, >but this will definitely annoy the C programmers. So what. "Annoying" would be to have a situation that is *less* powerful in Perl than in C, not *more*. Oh, and eval BLOCK and do BLOCK and bare statements in a file (not in a sub) should allow return() too. -- Bart.
- The distinction between "do BLOCK while COND&qu... Bart Lateur
- Re: The distinction between "do BLOCK whil... Peter Scott
- Re: The distinction between "do BLOCK ... Nathan Torkington
- Re: The distinction between "do BL... Tom Christiansen
- Re: The distinction between "d... Bart Lateur
- Re: The distinction between &q... Tom Christiansen
- Re: The distinction betwee... Christopher J. Madsen
- Re: The distinction be... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: The distinction be... Christopher J. Madsen
- Re: The distinction be... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: The distinction be... Tom Christiansen
- Re: The distinction be... Christopher J. Madsen
- Re: The distinction be... Tom Christiansen
- Re: The distinction be... Christopher J. Madsen
- do BLOCK as inline sub... Uri Guttman