Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: implied pascal-like"with"or "express"

[Markus Peter]

On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, David L. Nicol wrote:
> And you dont have to make sure the $s on the left of the names match
> the {}s on the right, just use one $ and string the names together with
> backslashes. This is not easier?
> 
> 
> $one{two}                     is $one\two
> $$one{two}{three}             is $one\two\three
> $$$one{two}{three}{four}      is $one\two\three\four

Sounds nice

> If we have _that_ already,
> 
> with %one\two {
>       
>       push @\three\four, 5,6;
> 
> }

In combination with the above possibility this makes real sense, so forget
my objections about the backslash....

--
Markus Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]