Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "express"

[Bart Lateur]

On Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:03:48 -0600 (MDT), Nathan Torkington wrote:

>Normally what you'd say is:
>
>  with (%record) {
>    ....
>  }
>
>(look at me, using Larry's new ... operator :-)

No you didn't. You typed four dots.

-- 
        Bart.