> > exists (sometimes causes autovivification, which affects C<keys>)
>
> That's not technically accurate--exists never causes autovivification.
print keys %hash, "\n";
exists $hash{key}{subkey};
print keys %hash, "\n";
Or did that get fixed when I wasn't looking?
(And yes, of course I know the distinction that makes you techically
correct, but I don't think it is germane to this argument :-)
Damian
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and metho... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and m... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys a... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and metho... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and metho... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and metho... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and metho... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and m... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and metho... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Damian Conway
