>That's not required. All that is necessary is for C<exists> nodes >in the op tree to propagate a special non-autovivifying context to >subordinate nodes. That seems reasonable--except that I don't believe exists() merits any special treatment. --tom
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and m... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys a... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and metho... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and metho... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and metho... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and metho... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and m... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and metho... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Damian Conway