On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 11:21:30AM -0400, Joe McMahon wrote:
> This is NOT completely thought out yet; I've been mulling it over as a
> possible RFC. I'm not happy with this syntax as it stands - there's too
> much possible action at a distance. I'm not seeing a nicely-parseable,
> easily-understandable way of doing this. Would this be a possible:
>
> $string =~ /(\d\d)-(\d\d)-(\d\d)?&{push @list,makedate(\1,\2,\3)}/g;
>
> Or is that just too ugly and nasty for words?
How about something like this?
$re = qr/(\d\d)-(\d\d)-(\d\d)/g;
$re->onmatch_callback(push @list, makedate(^0,^1,^2));
$string =~ $re;
-Scott
--
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Joe McMahon
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Damien Neil
