Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote: > > As a thought guide: think of C<lreturn> returning a reference to its > argument, and the call to lvsub() performing a dereference. Thought guide? Given a macro language and reference reasonablizing, this looks like you've just compeltely defined lreturn! macrodef lreturn(*) return \* Of course without reference reasonableizing, we've got problems. Looks like a case for automatic dereferencing!
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able ... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be a... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines sh... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines sh... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines sh... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines sh... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to retur... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to return an ... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to retur... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to r... Tom Christiansen