Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... the PDL folks who were the drivers for the current lvalue sub > implementation ... I assume they are on this list, then. -- Johan
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be abl... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be abl... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to return a... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to ret... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be abl... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines shou... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be abl... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines shou... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines ... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines ... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines shou... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to ret... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 132 (v1) subroutines should be able to return a... David L. Nicol
