> I'm surprised there hasn't be a good overhaul of the prototyping > system proposeed yet. What exactly didn't you like about RFC 128??? Damian
- RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warn... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warn... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warn... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Hildo Biersma
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warn... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a ... Hildo Biersma
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserve... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Philip Newton
- Re: matters supersessionary (was: RFC 238 (v1... Tom Christiansen
