Bart Lateur wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 10:26:48 +0100, Hildo Biersma wrote: > > >> length(@ary) deserves a warning > > > >Right now, the Lint back-end gives a warning in these cases (use of > >array in scalar context). > > > >Can we make the RFC more generic, and propose to move the Lint warnings > >into the core? > > But using arrays in a scalar context usually isn't an error. So, we make the warnings smarter and make sure they can be turned off...
- RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warn... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warn... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warn... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Hildo Biersma
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warn... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a ... Hildo Biersma
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserve... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning Philip Newton
- Re: matters supersessionary (was: RFC 238 (v1... Tom Christiansen