Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > =item Functional Programming > > Just because Perl has a C<map> operator, this doesn't make it a > functional programming language. Perl has always been squarely > procedural, It has also been roundly object-oriented and rectangularly functional, at least since perl5. By your logic, the OO stuff should never have been added. > ...let's not add the entirety of LISP and ML to the core. I don't think anyone's proposing that; but I'll give you an argument about it anyway. :-) > The CS types may love it, but I'm a programmer and I don't. I'm both, and I think Perl would be Better for having it. -- John Porter Aus tiefem Traum bin ich erwacht.
- RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. skud
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. John Porter
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay... skud
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should ... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay... Chaim Frenkel