On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 12:35:58AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I do *not* want to see any more obscenity of name calling here. It does
> nothing to advance the purposes of this working group, and discourages
> people from contributing.
You're quite right, I went too far there. Yes, I was frustrated but
that doesn't excuse bad language and behaviour. My apologies to all
on the list.
--
"So i get the chance to reread my postings to asr at times, with a
corresponding conservation of the almighty leviam00se, Kai Henningsen."
-- Megahal (trained on asr), 1998-11-06
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. skud
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. John Porter
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl... skud
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Simon Cozens
