At 10:43 AM 8/4/00 -0400, Kyle R . Burton wrote: > > One of my many RFCs will include a proposal for a $SELF variable along > > those lines. > >Why not allow for the choice of the name of self, perhaps through a pragma? > >use self => 'self'; >use self => 'this'; > >or something along those lines -- since it's currently up to the devleoper >anyway. Somethign about a capitolized SELF is unappealing to my eyes. Agreed. It also looks wrong to use all caps for a lexical rather than a package global. -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (wa... skud
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (wa... Johan Vromans
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (wa... Damian Conway
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... Hildo Biersma
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... Andy Wardley
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... Glenn Linderman
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... Tom Christiansen
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... J. David Blackstone
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... J. David Blackstone
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... Kyle R . Burton
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... Peter Scott
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... Johan Vromans
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... Damian Conway
- Re: named parameters Piers Cawley
- Re: named parameters Damian Conway
- Re: named parameters Tim Jenness
- Re: named parameters Damian Conway
- Re: named parameters Damian Conway