Andy Wardley wrote: > What about '$me'? It ties in nicely with 'my' (although perhaps for the > wrong reasons), it's half as much typing as 'self' or 'this' and we get > to annoy both sets of religious zealots at once. :-)= Yes, absolutely. Now what good meanings could we attribute to $myself and $I ? -- Glenn ===== There are two kinds of people, those who finish what they start, and so on... -- Robert Byrne _______________________________________________ Why pay for something you could get for free? NetZero provides FREE Internet Access and Email http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
- Re: named parameters Dan Sugalski
- Re: named parameters Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: named parameters Ken Fox
- New Group proposed: subs (was Re: named param... Uri Guttman
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re: nam... Spider Boardman
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re: nam... skud
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re: nam... Johan Vromans
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re: named p... Damian Conway
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re: nam... Hildo Biersma
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re:... Andy Wardley
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re:... Glenn Linderman
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re:... Tom Christiansen
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re:... J. David Blackstone
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re:... J. David Blackstone
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re: nam... Kyle R . Burton
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re:... Peter Scott
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re:... Johan Vromans
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re: nam... Damian Conway
- Re: named parameters Piers Cawley
- Re: named parameters Damian Conway
- Re: named parameters Tim Jenness