I'm not sure it makes sense, I'd really like to get rid of the last propogating out of a sub. (or a grep/map). But if that doesn't fly, we do have Damian's new yield keyword available to do it. <chaim> >>>>> "JH" == Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JH> I think we need a general way of short-circuiting out of a grep JH> (and other list iterating funcs, if it makes sense...) We may JH> need both success and failure short-circuits? It's a pity 'last' JH> already has semantics there, not to mention return... -- Chaim Frenkel Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statem... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statem... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statem... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch s... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin swit... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch s... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Damian Conway
- ConwayPerl (was Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switc... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Bart Lateur
- RE: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Lipscomb, Al
- RE: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Damian Conway
- RE: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Lipscomb, Al