Nathan Wiger wrote: > > I think the principle of a "general purpose placeholder" is a good one. > But I think _ is already used so much in Perl that something else is > better. I like ^ since is looks like a carat ("insert your variable > here"), personally. Or even a thumbtack, holding the variable down to be filled in at a later time. Mnemonics galore! My goodness, what have we done. :) Henceforth being seen and not heard (at least for a bit), Mike Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Different higher-order func notation? (was Re: RFC 23... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Different higher-order func notation? (was Re... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func notation? (wa... Mike Pastore
- Re: Different higher-order func notation?... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Different higher-order func nota... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func ... John Porter
- Re: Different higher-order func nota... Damian Conway
- Re: Different higher-order func nota... Mike Pastore
- Re: Different higher-order func nota... John Porter
- Re: Different higher-order func notation?... Ken Fox
- Re: Different higher-order func nota... Mike Pastore
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Ken Fox
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Ken Fox
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Mike Pastore
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Nathan Wiger