Nathan Wiger wrote:
>
> I think the principle of a "general purpose placeholder" is a good one.
> But I think _ is already used so much in Perl that something else is
> better. I like ^ since is looks like a carat ("insert your variable
> here"), personally.
Or even a thumbtack, holding the variable down to be filled in at a
later time. Mnemonics galore!
My goodness, what have we done. :)
Henceforth being seen and not heard (at least for a bit),
Mike Pastore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Different higher-order func notation? (was Re: RFC 23... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Different higher-order func notation? (was Re... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func notation? (wa... Mike Pastore
- Re: Different higher-order func notation?... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Different higher-order func nota... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func ... John Porter
- Re: Different higher-order func nota... Damian Conway
- Re: Different higher-order func nota... Mike Pastore
- Re: Different higher-order func nota... John Porter
- Re: Different higher-order func notation?... Ken Fox
- Re: Different higher-order func nota... Mike Pastore
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Ken Fox
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Ken Fox
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Mike Pastore
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Nathan Wiger
