Steve Fink writes:
> What about updating RFCs? Should I increment the version number and send
> each new revision to perl-rfc? Do I need to be careful about the RFC
> number when submitting updates?
Yes and yes.
> Also, I assumed the intention of the RFCs was to stimulate focused
> discussion and to keep a record of the decisions made during that
> discussion in the RFC. Is that true? Or, asked another way, is the
> maintainer of an RFC automatically responsible for tracking the related
> discussions and recording the decisions made in them?
Uh, yes. The RFC pixies are, unfortunately, not yet implemented.
Until they are, someone will have to maintain the RFCs and that
someone is the, uh, maintainer. We don't need a daily blow-by-blow,
but when it looks like conclusions have been reached, write 'em up.
Nat
