Glenn Linderman wrote: > > When using an inline comment, I want to spend my character budget mostly > on the comment, and just enough on the delimiters to see it > effectively. #< magic here ># would do quite nicely > > When reading a script, I'd like to be able to quickly distinguish the > comments using my eyeballs and brain, without the need to involve my > fingers and editor.... Bogus arguments both, at least wrt #<...># vs qc<...>. Same number of characters overhead, same LACK of obviosity to the eyeball. -- John Porter
- Re: Proto-RFC: A Standard Always-Live Prepr... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, ... Russ Allbery
- Preprocessing (Was: Re: Recording what we d... Johan Vromans
- Re: Preprocessing (Was: Re: Recording what ... Russ Allbery
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, ... Johan Vromans
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, ... Johan Vromans
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, ... John Porter
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, ... Glenn Linderman
- MLC has its own sublist: WAS: Re: Recording... John Porter
- MLC has its own sublist: WAS: Re: Recording... Michael Mathews
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, ... raptor
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and ... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Buddha Buck
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Dan Sugalski
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Nathan Torkington
- Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why Damian Conway