Jeremy Howard wrote: > Yes, they're not identical. What I mean of course is: > (..-1) == reverse(map -__ (1..)); WHAT? So the semantics of .. are magically different in the context of (..$n) so as to produce numbers in descending order? I don't think so. -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) lists Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 24 (v1) Semi-finite (lazy) l... Ariel Scolnicov
- Infinite lists (was Re: RFC 24 (... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Infinite lists (was Re: RFC ... Ken Fox
- Re: Infinite lists (was Re: RFC ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Infinite lists (was Re: RFC ... John Porter
- Re: Infinite lists (was Re: RFC ... Ken Fox
- Re: Infinite lists (was Re: RFC ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Infinite lists (was Re: RFC ... John Porter
- Re: Infinite lists (was Re: RFC ... Ted Ashton
- Re: Infinite lists (was Re: RFC ... John Porter
- Re: Infinite lists (was Re: RFC ... Ted Ashton
- Re: Infinite lists (was Re: RFC ... James Mastros
- Re: Infinite lists (was Re: RFC ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Infinite lists (was Re: RFC ... Ted Ashton
- Re: Infinite lists (was Re: RFC ... Damian Conway