Matt Sergeant wrote: > > I don't want to see Perl6 be so > fundamentally different to perl5 that I have to translate every single > script. I want some better stuff, but a new language is not what I'm > looking for. Well, I guess we all want something a little different. I, for example, want a New, Better language, and I don't care if all my scripts need rewriting. (I predict that that will happen anyway.) My old stuff will continue to work with perl5. -- John Porter
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Bart Lateur
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Bart Lateur
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Peter Scott
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() and gmtime... Matt Sergeant
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() and g... John Porter
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() a... Uri Guttman
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() and g... Jonathan Scott Duff