Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 02:09:43AM +0200, Bart Lateur wrote: >> On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 14:39:39 -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > >Did not. > >> > people in Newfoundland are going to expect to be >> >> able to pass in -0230 and have that work, and that's interestingly hard. >> >> What's so hard? Subtracting 2 hours and 30 minutes from the official >> referential time (GMT)? Or the Daylight Savings Time rules? > >Without any further thought I'll just shoot and say the DST rules because >they are legislation and fickle, not logic/astronomy and stable. One of the most amusing of which is that at the UNIX epoch (Jan 1, 1970) Greenwich (i.e. London) of GMT was not on GMT but BST which that year (or so) stood for "British Standard Time" not "British Summer Time". -- Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace local... John Tobey
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Bart Lateur
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Bart Lateur
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Peter Scott
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() and gmtime... Matt Sergeant
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() and g... John Porter
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() a... Uri Guttman
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() and g... Jonathan Scott Duff