[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : > Most of the requests for deletion seem to begin with, "This isn't : > used..." : > : > To which, "*I* use it." is a very valid argument. : : Agreed. The real problem with ?...? is that it complicates the hell out : of the parser. So long as the special magic is retained for m?...?, I : would suggest that raw ?...? could beneficially disappear. Or turned into m//f, or some such. Must think about relationship to an extension-based reset operator as well. To maintain current semantics we'd need introspection into the regular expressions used in a particular package. Larry
- Re: Things to remove Russ Allbery
- Re: Things to remove Tom Christiansen
- Re: Things to remove Larry Wall
- Re: Things to remove Bart Lateur
- Re: Things to remove Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Things to remove Mike Pastore
- Re: Things to remove Casey R. Tweten
- Re: Things to remove Steve Simmons
- Re: Things to remove Nathan Torkington
- Re: Things to remove Damian Conway
- Re: Things to remove Larry Wall
- Re: Things to remove Bart Lateur
- Re: Things to remove Tom Christiansen
- Re: Things to remove Ed Mills
- Re: Things to remove Simply Hao
- Re: Things to remove Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Things to remove Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Things to remove Ted Ashton
- Re: Things to remove Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Things to remove Bart Lateur
- Re: Things to remove Riad Wahby